Maribou ([info]maribou) wrote,
  • Mood: quixotic
  • Music: Suzanne Vega, "If I Were a Weapon"

if I were a robber baron, I tell you what I'd do

(caveats and context for this piece in comments below)

The scene: A posh office suite at the headquarters of the brand-new entity Harper & PenguinMifflin House; the year: 2015. A solid, competent-looking woman sits confidently behind a rather large desk, while a reedy and wild-eyed man delivers the following peroration:

Look, Bertie, I know and you know that this hegemonic model is not going to last forever. Unless we go the way of the Comcasts and Walt Disneys of the world, twisting the legal foundations of the country to protect our bottom line, we're headed straight for a crash into the rising wall of the Creative Commons revolution. I know you just wrenched all these different publishing houses out of that giant megacorp from hell because you were tired of being mangled by twenty different sharks above you on the org chart. I know that none of *them* understood that publishing isn't only about dollars and cents - that you have some deep feelings for your product and you don't think it's just another way to milk the suckers, or you'd have stuck to selling widgets like your daddy did - and if you listen to these DRM guys with their ever-increasing byzantine demands, you'll be buying a ticket straight back to Widgetville. We can do a lot better than that. An adversarial relationship with the people most inclined to love our product just isn't going to cut it anymore.

They have alternatives, you know. And we can't beat those alternatives unless we join them. The real bite out of the book market isn't piracy *or* the kind of casual sharing that's been around since the nineteenth century - it's freely given free stuff. These days, readers want to give their money to the creators they feel they *know* - whose personas they are in love with, whose art they respect, whose dreams they share, or whose jokes they find fucking hilarious. If they see us as their enemy in doing that, the leeches who siphon off money they'd rather spend somewhere else, they'll skip right to that ubiquitous "personal donation" button Legal could never manage to outlaw, the one that's on every website out there these days, and they'll bypass us entirely. Instead we need to position ourselves as co-conspirators. Content sharers. Individuals who love words every goddamn bit as much as they do and for whom money is a secondary or instrumental pleasure, the grease we need to keep the rollers whirring, not an end in itself. If we can win their hearts, make them feel about us like they feel about Aspidistra Flying or Jonny Swift, we'll be able to *give* things away - no strings - and then they'll come pay us for them later.

n the interim, while we stoke the fires of their passion and do the long hard slog of cleaning up the antagonistic mess all those huge corporations made of our PR, we need to *ditch* DRM, not refine it. And hell, while we're at it, sell books to libraries at a discount, not a premium, whether they're e- or not: win the hearts of the librarians and we'll win the hearts of readers. Put "personal donation" buttons on our imprint webpages and let people feel like they're part of our process, not the suckers we make bank on. It'll be so confusing to all those mindless megacorps that we'll be merger-proof. Yes, it's contrarian. Yes, it's a gamble. But you didn't get where you are by following the crowd. There's plenty of capital available to invest in this. And we both know our kids' trust funds are safe, right? What is there to lose but Jacob Marley's chains? Don't you remember those press conferences you gave when you were cutting us loose from ProctorWarnerSonyBoeing, the ones about "promoting the progress of science and useful arts" and the great history of the independent publishers? Didn't you *mean* them?

We can reposition ourselves to be something other than Just Another Faceless Corporation; we can make bank *and* have fun, and go home at the end of the night feeling like heroes, not hollow men. It can be the way we always dreamed it would be when we were kids together, Bertie. You don't have to play their fucking game.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 7 comments

[info]maribou

February 2 2011, 20:09:41 UTC 1 year ago

So, uh, I know I have a lot of author friends and acquaintances who believe in the necessity of DRM and are deeply worried about piracy and/or rampant casual sharing, to which I can only quote Shakespeare: "If we shadows have offended..." I respect your concerns. I don't want to steal your livelihood. I just believe (some parts of me do, anyway, some part of the time) that there's a better way. I'm quite clear that y'all could be a lot righter than I am. But it's a thought experiment, and the way I'm wired, I sometimes have to break stuff to think properly.

Some context: First a publisher-consultant guy wrote this, which my good friend Laura linked to here, and then following that discussion my other good friend Steve posted this: "Thinking more about the linked post and discussion here http://friendfeed.com/lsw... I have a thought experiment. You are an executive at one of the largest trade publishers in the world, Harper & PenguinMifflin House. The CEO wants a vision of DRM & library circulation of ebooks for 2021 that is both realistic and optimized for the publisher's interest. Go." You can read his excellent, plausible, rational-assumptions based answer to his own question in the thread I just linked to. This was mine. I had to add some extra premises, instead of playing fair, because the question as posed just broke my little old Canadian socialist heart.

[info]hpapillon

February 2 2011, 22:00:18 UTC 1 year ago

What about friends deeply worried about piracy but NOT believing in DRM? :) I'm not worried about people pirating stuff, I'm worried about them pirating and not paying for it and not seeing any reason why they should. Which they do, hugely. And sadly we don't even have libraries in my industry. I'd happily sell site licenses to libraries and let all their users play if that were an option, I just need to make some money to live on...

[info]maribou

February 3 2011, 01:12:50 UTC 1 year ago

Hm. This post was specifically about what (in a bluesky world), I would like to see giant publishers with lots of capital do. I don't really understand the gaming industry well enough to say what I'd like them to do, let alone small individual creators in that industry. What do you think would work?

[info]maribou

February 3 2011, 01:13:10 UTC 1 year ago

(And, I'm not trying to be disingenuous, I'd love to know.)

[info]manintheboat

February 2 2011, 21:06:24 UTC 1 year ago

OT:

I had a dream about [info]birdmojo last night. We went to the grocery store that was being remodeled and had plastic sheeting and wallabies everywhere. [info]birdmojo was wearing an orange dress, feathery hat, and heels. He kept saying, "I want to pet the wallaby but [info]maribou won't let me." He'd look behind him and pet the wallaby.


Remember when we pet the wallabies at the zoo! <3 <3 <3!

[info]maribou

February 3 2011, 01:13:30 UTC 1 year ago

Heh. That's wonderful. And I DO remember that.

[info]cartoon_goblin

February 4 2011, 11:37:02 UTC 1 year ago

This is great! I love it!
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…